Like the Yorkshire Evening Post reporting on the city of Leeds potentially getting a tram system once a year, Angus Kinnear made his now annual appearance on The Square Ball podcast and provided the latest update on the 49ers Enterprisesโ plans to expand Elland Road stadium.
You can listen to the podcast here โ or watch it on YouTube here โ with Kinnear also chatting about this summerโs transfer window, the sale of Archie Gray, Leedsโ PSR position, and lots more.
On the stadium redevelopment, the big update is that an even bigger update is coming soon, although it sounds like the plans for a 60,000 capacity that Kinnear mentioned on the podcast in 2021 have been revised slightly:
โThe good news about the stadium is, for the first time in the six and a half years or seven years that I’ve been involved in the club, I think we’ve got some real traction behind the stadium. So the 49ers have committed a multimillion-pound sum on putting together a project team which has environmentalists, transport planners, the design team, the structural engineers, the mechanical engineers.
โThat team now is meeting two or three times a week with a view to submitting the planning application. There’s going to be an announcement very shortly about that. And within that, you’ll get a degree of granularity in the plans around stadium capacity. I think at the moment it’s looking like it’s going to be 53,000. That’s the most economic number.
โWithin that, you’ll also get a sense of the broad split, which hasn’t been decided yet, between GA (general admission) and hospitality seats. But there’ll be a significant GA increase, but there will also be an increase in premium seats on that side as well, because the West Stand doesn’t really have any workable hospitality as it stands.โ
On that delicate balance between increasing general admission tickets as well as corporate facilities, Kinnear says:
โThere’s no hiding from the fact that increasing the number of premium seats will be part of the plan. That’s why all of the planning applications that are currently underway are for the West Stand and the North Stand.
โThe vision at the moment is the North Stand wouldn’t have any hospitality at all, and the West Stand would have an increase in hospitality. You cannot fund a stadium build just on GA seats. You need premium seats in there. And I think there will also be a bigger spread of premium seats.
โOne of the things that Leeds United doesn’t have very many of โ it’s got the Bremner [suite], I think โ is a base level of, in industry terms, premium GA, but it’s effectively a GA seat which has an element of hospitality on it, but actually is a huge step up for supporters.
โAnd at both West Ham and Arsenal, we found lots and lots of existing season ticket holders were prepared to step up into premium general admission to get a better located seat and access to a bar.โ
For example, Leeds are currently selling โhospitality packagesโ for Yeboahโs Crossbar (an outdoor marquee next to the Pavilion opposite the stadium) which include a free pie, pint, and matchday programme, as well as a seat in the East Upper. For the visit of Sheffield United in October, fans could pay ยฃ165 for that โpremiumโ experience.
Which brings us neatly onto general admission ticket prices, and whether paying ยฃ49 to sit in a decrepit West Stand and watch second-tier football is aฬถ ฬถrฬถiฬถpฬถ ฬถoฬถfฬถfฬถ reasonable:
โI think if you look at ticket prices and index it against inflation over the last twenty to thirty years, the increases are not significantly above inflation. So I think I’m certainly at the age where everything just seems expensive and it does feel like a lotโฆโ
โฆless so if you got paid ยฃ1.4m the season Leeds got relegatedโฆ
โโฆbut if you take out all the premium seats, then the GA seats have gone broadly, I think, across the football industry in line with inflation.โ
Using an inflation calculator to compare the price of old Leeds tickets to today, Iโm not sure thatโs strictly accurate. Or at least not as accurate as saying, โFootball clubs around the country are overcharging supporters, and Leeds are no different.โ Kinnearโs justification is essentially that, given the demand for tickets far outweighs the supply, Leeds could have increased ticket prices even more but havenโt, and we should be thanking the 49ers for that:
โClearly, it needs owners who have a relationship with a fanbase and a desire, and this is where I think the 49ers have been great. You could look at all the modelling in the world and you could look at increasing the prices of lead United tickets because we’ve got 22,000 people on the season ticket waiting list, and actually, season ticket prices have increased, I think, twice in the last ten years, and actually have increased very modestly.โ
Touching upon the season ticket waiting list, Kinnear says โitโs very difficult to be completely transparentโ where fans are in the pecking order because only โslightly more than a handfulโ become available every year. โThe opportunity for people on the season ticket waiting list to get a seat is going to be when the new stand is builtโ.
By the time the new stand is built, could Elland Road be renamed by our new energy drink overlords, or could it be the home of Red Bull Leeds?
โItโs not going to happen. All I can say is that it’s never been a consideration in terms of it’s never been raised by them. It’s never been anything that’s been offered. Paraag has been adamant, and I’m with him on this, that it’s not going to happen.
โI think to give the fans some kind of reassurance in the direction of travel, I think over the last couple of weeks, you’ll have seen that Red Bull have announced more traditional sponsorship deals. I think they’re going to end up with five or six clubs, which are going to be more traditional sponsorship partnerships.
โWe’re very proud that they chose Leeds United to be the first of those because this is, although it has an ownership stake in it, this is about driving the brand awareness through football in a market that they haven’t been in historically.
โThe values of the deal are absolutely transformational from a commercial perspective. We’re not going to publish the values, but they are a multiple of what we’d have expected otherwise. It’s a really high level of commitment.
…
โI understand the fans’ concerns about what’s happened elsewhere. Itโs very difficult to give them absolute certainty that it’s never going to happen again, but it is not the 49ersโ plan. It’s not the 49ersโ plan to sell to Red Bull. It’s not Red Bull’s plan to buy Leeds United. It is by and large a sponsorship deal which has an equity element to it. And I think it’s going to be one of the pillars which is going to frame our commercial success, which will ultimately frame our footballing success.โSo I think my perspective will be in four to five years’ time, everyone will look back on the Red Bull deal and they’ll see from a commercial perspective it was the catalyst for the commercial growth which has fuelled Leeds United becoming a top-ten Premier League side.โ
Kinnear himself says that if Red Bull were to take over Leeds and try to rebrand the club, โI could categorically say I wouldnโt be part of Leeds United if itโs changing its name.โ Which is very noble, but no use to us if he was part of the group that let the bull in the china shop.
I sincerely hope Kinnear and Marathe are correct when they say Red Bull have no intention of taking over Leeds United. If that proves to be true, then Leeds fans will have been shown to be overly cynical, which our recent history shows is healthy. If it proves to be false, then Leeds’ current ownership will have been shown to be overly naive, which our recent history shows is dangerous. โฌข